Human-like conversational agents as social partners: a scoping review of socioaffective mechanisms, well-being outcomes, risks and governance in the post-Turing era
Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026
Mapungraded
- Design
- Scoping review (evidence map)
- Risk of bias
- Some concerns
- Sample
- Not reported
- AI type
- Companion / social AI apps
- Outcomes
- Wellbeing, Dependence, Social connection
Authors' conclusion
“DISCUSSION: We propose an integrative pathway linking model capabilities and product design cues to relational outcomes and outline a companion-specific relational safety stack as a synthesis-based evaluation agenda rather than a validated regulatory or clinical standard. The review identifies measurement priorities for evaluating companion agents and governance priorities for managing psychosocial impact as these systems scale.”Quoted verbatim from the abstract.
Draft grade. Level and risk of bias were assigned by our agent and await expert review. How we grade
Read the paper →DOI 10.3389/frai.2026.1810097Related
- L2How AI and Human Behaviors Shape Psychosocial Effects of Extended Chatbot Use: A Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Study2025
- L4Impact of media dependence: how emotional interactions between users and chat robots affect human socialization?2024
- L4Interaction with AI companions and psychological well-being2026
- L4Living with and without AI: A mixed-methods study on AI usage, addiction, and 'AIlessphobia' in nursing students2025